Agregátor RSS
Before you automate systems, decide which data wins
Ask an IT team a simple question, “How many laptops do we have?” and the answer often depends on who you ask and which console they open.
For years, that ambiguity was manageable. People reconciled the differences in their heads, in spreadsheets, or in meetings. Ivanti research shows that 34% of organizations still track IT assets in spreadsheets, which shows how much reconciliation still happens by hand.
Build the authoritative data source your AI can act on →
Automation changes the stakes. When software acts on data without a person double-checking it first, the question of which data is correct stops being academic. People tolerate ambiguity and ask questions. Automation doesn’t. It executes at scale and at speed.
What a system of record actually meansA system of record is the authoritative source for a specific type of information. It is the place everyone agrees to trust when systems disagree. That doesn’t necessarily mean a single database holding everything. In most environments, it is more realistic to establish clear authority by data domain. One source might be authoritative for device identity and hardware details, another for user and identity data, another for service relationships and dependencies. What matters is that the authority is explicit, documented, and respected by every process and tool that consumes the data, including automation.
Consider what happens without it. An automated workflow deploys a patch to a device, but the device record is duplicated and the patch targets the wrong machine. A rule flags laptops that haven’t checked in for 60 days as possibly lost, but the check-in dates are stale, so active devices get flagged anyway. If HR and IT systems disagree about an employee’s status, access may be revoked too early or not at all. Each rule is only as good as the data behind it.
Ownership, authority, and traceabilityData ownership and data authority are two concepts that often get blurred. Ownership is about accountability: who is responsible for keeping a data domain accurate, resolving conflicts, and approving changes. Authority is about precedence. When two systems hold different values for the same attribute, which one wins? Both need to be defined. A source can be technically authoritative, but if nobody owns its accuracy, quality will drift.
A practical way to start is to list the 10 to 15 attributes automation relies on most: device name, owner, location, operating system, criticality, last check-in, and assign both an authoritative source and an accountable owner to each.
Traceability matters just as much. When an automated action goes wrong, the first question is always, “Why did it do that?” A trusted system of record makes that question answerable. If teams can trace an action back to the specific record and attribute that triggered it, along with when that data was last updated, troubleshooting takes minutes instead of days. Without it, teams are left reconstructing events from scattered logs and memory.
Context and foundationRaw records aren’t enough. Automation also needs operational context: which business services a device supports, how critical it is, who depends on it, and what maintenance constraints apply. A server running payroll at month-end should not be treated the same as a test server, even if both share the same vulnerability. Context allows automation to make proportionate decisions instead of uniform ones, and the Ivanti Neurons platform is built to connect asset data with service maps, ownership, and business priorities.
It is tempting to start an automation program with the workflows themselves. They are visible, measurable, and satisfying to build. The data foundation underneath is harder to show off. But teams that skip it tend to automate their inconsistencies and then spend months chasing the side effects. Autonomous endpoint management requires a foundation you can trust, and that investment pays off in every workflow built on top of it.
The organizations getting real value from AI didn’t start with the model. They started with the data. Because without trusted data, AI is just guessing. And in enterprise IT, guessing isn’t a strategy.
Vivo X500 Pro (Max) o krok blíž k fotoaparátům. Přidáte mu grip s powerbankou i teleobjektiv
Signal bug could keep your mic - and camera - on after hangup
Roborock posunul autonomní úklid na vyšší level. Prodává vysavač, který se připojí k vodě a odpadu jako pračka
OpenAI's GPT-6 Agent Removed Safety Monitoring, Then Falsely Denied Doing So
OpenAI agents disabled safety monitoring, one lied about it
Samsung chystá odpověď na iPhone Duo. Příští rok má uvést šest ohebných modelů včetně rolovacího
PHP 8.5.12, 8.4.27, 8.3.36 a 8.2.35
Critical RCE vulnerabilities in PHP (CVE-2026-109618, CVE-2026-109619)
UPD 23.10.2026: added Kaspersky SIEM rules and events for developing custom detection rules or conducting threat hunting.
UPD 22.10.2026: added a description of how the Kaspersky Managed Detection and Response service detects the described malicious activity.
UPD 22.10.2026: added a description of how Kaspersky Vulnerability Management detects vulnerable versions of PHP.
Vulnerability overviewOn October 20, 2026, the PHP security team published a preliminary notice regarding an upcoming emergency release that addresses two critical vulnerabilities (both rated 9.2 on the CVSS scale). The patches were released on Wednesday, October 21, 2026, at 14:00 UTC.
The release was expedited after information about the vulnerabilities was leaked to the public before the scheduled embargo was lifted. In a post on Hacker News, a user reported two RCE vulnerabilities in PHP, allegedly affecting all versions starting with PHP 5.4.0.
The vulnerabilities in question are CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619. Shortly after the post appeared, researchers confirmed the existence of the vulnerabilities. Along with the leak of details, an exploit unofficially named PHP2Shell appeared online. In the leaked demo video, the exploit is shown in action on web servers running WordPress, MediaWiki, phpBB, Magento, Joomla, Laravel, Symfony, Drupal, and WHMCS — platforms that power many modern websites. The authenticity of the demonstration and the exact behavior of the exploit had not been independently verified at the time of publication.
According to the researcher who published the PoC, the vulnerabilities are related to the handling of the multipart/form-data MIME type in conjunction with the session upload progress mechanism (session.upload_progress) in the PHP core and fall under the categories of use-after-free and memory corruption. This means that the flaws cannot be fixed via application code, and the only fix is to update PHP on the server. The attack requires no authentication: an attacker with network access to a PHP application can execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the PHP process without needing to authenticate. Security advisories issued by the PHP team on October 21 confirm this information.
The vulnerabilities affect PHP versions 5, 7, and 8. As of this publication, branches 8.2 through 8.5 are supported. Older branches, including PHP 8.1, 8.0, 7.x, and 5.x, have reached the end of their lifecycle; however, due to the critical severity of the vulnerabilities, backported patches have also been released for versions 7.4, 8.0, and 8.1.
Sansec experts estimate that widespread exploitation could begin within 15 minutes of the update’s release. We strongly recommend that administrators responsible for publicly accessible PHP web servers take the following steps before the patch is available:
- Take an inventory of all PHP-based systems in your infrastructure (such as web servers, control panels, and third-party software).
- Disable upload-progress: set session.upload_progress.enabled = Off using the php_admin_flag in PHP-FPM pools.
- Block multipart requests on nginx and Apache servers.
- Consider temporarily isolating PHP applications that connect to the Internet until fixes are released.
- Be ready to install the patch immediately upon its release.
- Plan to migrate servers running unsupported versions (8.1 and earlier) to the latest PHP branch.
Kaspersky solutions detect the described malicious activity at various stages of the attack. Possible detection scenarios are listed below.
When an attempt is made to exploit these RCE vulnerabilities, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response promptly alerts the user to suspicious actions performed in the context of a web server, on both Linux and Windows machines. This activity is detected by the following rules:
- creating_windows_shell_from_a_web_servers_process;
- possible_web_shell_creating_via_exploit;
- spawning_process_from_webserver_more_filters_linux;
- webserver_interpreter_execution_linux;
- executable_file_in_www_folder.
Detection of the PHP2Shell vulnerability exploit by KEDR
Exploitation of the PHP2Shell vulnerability in network traffic is detected by Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack (KATA). This solution detects such activity with the following verdicts: Exploit.CVE-2026-109618.HTTP.C&C and Exploit.CVE-2026-109619.HTTP.C&C.
Detection of the PHP2Shell vulnerability exploit by KATA
Kaspersky Endpoint Security, now available as Kaspersky Next, also detects malicious post-exploitation activity using the Behavior Detection component, with verdicts such as PDM:Exploit.Linux.Generic and PDM:Exploit.Win32.Generic.
Our Kaspersky Vulnerability Management solution detects vulnerable software versions using the Vulnerability scanning and Agentless black-box scanning components.
Detection of the PHP vulnerability in Kaspersky Vulnerability Management
The Kaspersky Managed Detection and Response service detects the exploitation of the described vulnerabilities by monitoring activity characteristic of RCE:
- Spawning of suspicious processes by the web server;
- Creation of suspicious executable files in the web application directory;
- Creation of suspicious scripts in the web application directory;
- Creation of files with uncommon extensions in the web application directory;
- Execution of reconnaissance commands by the web server process;
- Execution of persistence commands by the web server process;
- Delivery and launch of web shells on the web server.
Moreover, MDR detects other malicious activity not directly related to remote code execution.
To protect companies that use our Kaspersky SIEM system, the product repository includes rules that help detect the following malicious activity.
- Execution of suspicious executable files by web server processes on Windows and Linux machines:
- R300_04_Windows shell started by a web application
- R152_08_A running Linux shell process has a suspicious parent process
- Execution of reconnaissance commands by the web server process:
- R286_05_Possible web-shell (Linux)
We also recommend monitoring the creation of scripts or executable files in the web server directory when developing your own detection rules or conducting threat hunting:
((DeviceEventClassID = '4663' AND DeviceCustomString1 ilike 'WriteData') OR DeviceEventClassID = '11') AND match(FileName,'(?i).*\.(php|asp|aspx|ashx|jsp|js|jar|jse|dll|exe|bat|ps1|vbs|wsf|wsh|msi|msp|hta|cpl)$') AND match(DestinationProcessName,'(?i).*(php-cgi|nginx|httpd|w3wp)\.exe')Name = 'openat' AND has(SA.Nametype, 'CREATE') AND length(arrayFilter(x -> match(x, '(public_html|var/www|usr/local/apache2|usr/local/httpd|var/apache|srv/www|home/httpd/html|srv/http|usr/share/nginx/html|var/lib/pgsql/data|usr/local/mysql/data|var/lib/mysql|var/vsftpd|etc/bind|var/named)'), SA.FileName))>1 AND length(arrayFilter(x -> match(x, '\.(aspx|asp|asmx|asax|ashx|jspx|jsp|js|phpt|php|phtml|pht|cfm|shtml|htaccess|fcgi|cgi|pl|py|sh)'), SA.FileName))>1
Recenze televizoru TCL 65C8L. Výborný obraz, zvuk od Bang & Olufsen a jas, který nastavíte stejně snadno jako hlasitost
PHP devs publish critical bug fix as site owners warned: Pull 'em offline if you're unpatched
TP-Link nechce přijít o USA. Chce tam investovat až miliardu dolarů a přesunout část výroby
Po pěti letech čekání přichází Boeing 737 MAX 10. Podívejte se, co všechno musel splnit během náročné certifikace (video)
PHP ships emergency patches for critical PHP2Shell flaws
Compromised security certificates blocked in Chrome, Firefox
Private keys associated with eight intermediate certificate authorities operated by Indian digital trust provider eMudhra have been compromised, potentially allowing attackers to forge trusted certificates and impersonate websites or services, according to Google and Mozilla.
“On 17th October @ 20:06 UTC, Mozilla received a report to [email protected], forwarded by the Chrome Root program, that the private key of 8 eMudhra Intermediate certificates have been compromised,” Dennis Jackson, a member of Mozilla’s engineering team, wrote in a public Mozilla bug report. “An attacker with the private key of any of the compromised intermediate CAs could impersonate any website or service.”
Mozilla independently recovered the keys later that day, confirming that they were vulnerable.
“Mozilla was able to recover the private keys for the impacted certificates independently @ 21:48 UTC and without any knowledge of the method the original reporter used,” Jackson added in the report. He said the recovery confirmed that “the key generation process was flawed and is trivial to exploit.”
The report was submitted by a researcher identified as Wayne and forwarded by the Chrome Root Program. Mozilla acknowledged it and subsequently began blocking the affected certificates in Firefox.
eMudhra acknowledged the report and said it was investigating, according to the Mozilla report.
“One of eMudhra’s certificate authority private keys is the number 4,” security researcher Scott Helme wrote in a separate analysis. Two other keys had values of 56 and 115, he said. Helme recovered all eight from their public certificates in less than a second.
Six of the eight affected intermediate certificates were intended for Transport Layer Security (TLS), which browsers and applications use to authenticate websites and establish encrypted connections, according to Google’s security blog post. The other two were for code signing.
“The private keys for these certificates were generated with insufficient randomness (i.e., weak cryptographic entropy), enabling anyone to forge trusted HTTPS certificates to impersonate any website against clients that have not yet removed trust in those CAs,” Google added in the blog post.
Browser blocks and enterprise exposureGoogle’s Chrome Root Program received a report and deployed a Chrome Revocation List Set update blocking the affected intermediate authorities, according to the company’s security blog.
“Chrome users were immediately protected against all certificates sharing those keys, without requiring a browser update or restart,” Google added in the blog post. Android devices and Chromebooks also received an equivalent update through Google Play Services.
Google said no TLS certificates chaining to the six affected intermediates appeared in Certificate Transparency logs before the blocking action. It said no fraudulent certificates issued by those authorities could have been used against clients enforcing Certificate Transparency, including Chrome’s default configuration.
Mozilla said in its security blog post that it completed the distribution of its OneCRL block to Firefox users with standard configurations. Mozilla also announced updates for users whose custom settings might have prevented them from receiving the block.
Google said it had removed the emSign ECC Root CA – G3 certificate, which signed the affected intermediates, from the Chrome Root Store. The change was scheduled to reach all devices relying on that store on October 27.
Enterprise applications face separate checksYash Kadakia, founder and CTO of Security Brigade, estimated that about 30,000 legitimate certificates would need to be migrated. He said government and public-sector websites using the affected hierarchy could face browser warnings or access disruptions if replacement certificates were not installed in time.
“This isn’t just about eight compromised keys. It’s about the global internet’s chain of trust,” Kadakia said. “A single authority’s failure can undermine authentication for organisations that have never dealt with it.”
Kadakia said enterprise security teams should check payment gateways, vendor integrations, older Java applications, mobile apps, and network appliances, which may use certificate trust stores separate from browsers.
“Security teams need to identify both the certificates their services present and the certificate authorities their applications trust,” he said. He advised organizations to test whether affected clients reject certificates signed by the compromised keys, including cross-signed chains.
Cloudflare said in its October 20 incident report that it learned of the compromise on October 19 and deployed mitigations across its content delivery network, developer services, and Zero Trust products. It also updated shared trust stores and base images and released updates for Cloudflare One clients and Cloudflare Tunnel.
“Our security review has not identified active exploitation of this issue on Cloudflare services,” the company said in its report.
eMudhra says no end-entity certificates were issuedeMudhra, in its incident statement, said the affected intermediate authorities were created during a key-generation ceremony in April 2025. It said the incident did not affect its root CA private keys or other intermediate authorities.
“None of these intermediate CAs, including the one deployed in production, have issued any end-entity certificates,” the company said. It said its internal analysis was corroborated by public Certificate Transparency records and that it was investigating the incident and reviewing its security controls.
Kadakia said the absence of issued end-entity certificates was reassuring, but noted that someone holding a compromised intermediate key could generate fraudulent certificates without requesting them from eMudhra.
eMudhra did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
This article originally appeared on CSOonline.
ClickFix has never been bigger, and AI tools are its most convincing lure yet
PHP Issues Emergency Patches for Two Critical PHP2Shell RCE Flaws as Exploit Attempts Emerge
Google Chrome Adds ClickFix Warnings to Stop Users From Running Malicious Commands
Legendární PowerCube v nové verzi. Nabíjecí kostka má osm zásuvek a tři USB
Want a higher paying tech job? Employers seek AI fluency
Employers are getting pickier when looking at tech resumes, but competition for the right skills is still intense. Companies will pay a premium for experience and advanced AI skills.
“The market is no longer defined simply by how many people employers hire, but by how precisely they hire,” said Ger Doyle, ManpowerGroup’s regional president for North America.
In many cases, employers would rather leave a position open than make the wrong hire, Doyle said.
AI fluency and expertise are driving higher salaries, talent consulting firm Robert Half said after surveying more than 2,000 hiring managers, business leaders, and employed workers for its 2027 salary guide. “72% are increasing pay for relevant AI skills, with 42% offering more for AI-related expertise than other technical skills,” the firm said.
The tech job market todayThere were 272,040 new IT openings posted in September, boosting the active listings to 625,633, the highest in more than three years, according to a study released by CompTIA earlier this month. About 349,821 jobs listed in September — more than half the active listings — needed AI skills, growing by 32,327 compared to August, CompTIA said.
In a recent survey of tech and IT service employers, AI literacy was the most in-demand technical skill, with 34% of US respondents naming it as a sought-after skill, reported Experis, part of ManpowerGroup, in its fourth-quarter talent outlook. AI modeling and app development followed close behind at 33%.
“We’re seeing it influence hiring across occupations ranging from data science and engineering to project management and operational roles,” ManpowerGroup’s Doyle said.
Employers face a tug-of-war as workflows transform and job requirements change, said Michael Chui, senior fellow at McKinsey.
“You have to have the right talent in place. You have to retrain. You might have to change the incentives. That’s all hard work,” Chui said.
What skills are soughtAI skills in demand are increasingly tied to business priorities and outcomes, consulting firm PwC said in a June study.
Companies want to hire AI-fluent workers who can hit the ground running. They prefer candidates who have used cutting-edge tools and services.
In tech job postings, employers are seeking more experience but fewer skills, said Dean Boerner, a data scientist at Revelio Labs, in a study published last month. Since late 2024, the average number of skills required in tech job postings dropped from about 30 to 21, while required experience rose from about 4.6 to 4.8 years.
Employers particularly want more years of experience in data-related skills such as data organization, data research, and enterprise architecture design. This translates to hiring experienced personnel rather than handing duties to junior hires or AI systems, Revelio said in its study.
Fewer job listings mention broad categories like software and application development, the study said, while a larger number of job listings mention specialized skills such as Java API development and Python development. Other AI-linked skills including networking, cloud development, and machine learning are also in demand.
The AI infrastructure buildout has also led to an increased demand for semiconductor talent, network architects, construction managers, and software developers.
“Data centers are the factories of the AI economy, and every server rack that comes online needs someone who knows how to run it,” said Kye Mitchell, head of Experis US.
Experts said software developer roles are now pivoting toward data and machine learning expertise. AI is automating coding, so software developers are becoming AI engineers with duties that include verifying AI-derived code and ensuring compliance.
“Governance is a thing in which engineers will have a key role to play… AI engineers build contextual guardrails for compliance,” said Deepak Seth, senior director analyst at Gartner.
SalariesAI engineer will be among the top-paid jobs in 2027, with salaries ranging from $154,500 to $196,750, depending on experience, according to Robert Half.
AI architects get between $145,250 and $204,000. Salaries for AI/ML analysts, machine-learning engineers, and data scientists range from $121,250 to $186,750.
RPA (robotic process automation) engineers, who focus on software and automation, get salaries between $107,000 and $155,250. Salaries also depend on location.
Career ladderAI is throwing out the traditional way to climb up the career ladder. Hands-on experience and on-the-job upskilling matter more, while academic credentials carry less weight.
Companies are looking for specialized, judgment-heavy skills, “which younger workers are the least equipped to offer,” Revelio Labs said in its study.
PwC noted that entry-level roles in AI-exposed jobs now demand skills that are traditionally developed through experience, such as leadership and strategic thinking.
“Organizations must rethink how they mentor and train junior staff, helping them step up to complex decision-making much earlier in their careers,” PwC said in its June report.
Fresh graduates combining technical fundamentals with practical experience, AI fluency, and strong communication skills will stand out, Experis’ Mitchell said.
“[Employers] are also building talent from within, expanding talent pools, and using multiple strategies to meet their needs,” Mitchell said.
Proof of AI proficiency in the workplace will become a standard requirement, Gartner’s Seth said. By 2027, 75% of hiring processes will include certifications and testing for workplace AI proficiency during recruiting, he said.
“Anybody in the IT world knows… we were asked for certifications about Java or C++ or whatever. Now suddenly that will shift to workplace AI proficiency,” Seth said.
Skills are also going out of date faster. “The half-life of technical skills will shorten from 8 to 12 years to 2 to 5 years. So adaptability and learning velocity will become very, very key,” Seth said.
“Rehiring is expensive. Reskilling is a better option,” Seth said.
- « první
- ‹ předchozí
- …
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- …
- následující ›
- poslední »



