Agregátor RSS
New stealthy Quasar Linux malware targets software developers
Nechte si proplatit pleny či monitor dechu. Přehled benefitů zdravotních pojišťoven spojených s mateřstvím
Privátní cloud pro malou firmu, školu nebo úřad: kontejnerová architektura
Softwarová sklizeň (6. 5. 2026): dopřejte svému AI agentovi dlouhodobou paměť
Extrémní dvojhvězda ohromila fyziky jako superurychlovač s výkonem 100 TeV
Reklamovanost Intel Core i9-13900KS překročila 20 %
Instructure hacker claims data theft from 8,800 schools, universities
All Life Uses 20 Amino Acids. Scientists Just Deleted One in Bacteria.
The synthetic bacteria push the limits of life and could open the door to designer proteins and new medicines.
The bacteria grew, thrived, and divided for hundreds of generations. But they were unlike any other living creatures on Earth. These synthetic cells, called Ec19, were the first to have had one protein “letter”—or amino acid—partially removed.
All life today relies on a set of 20 amino acids to make proteins. Some exotic microbes can use 22, but no one has yet found any that use less. Like letters in a book, amino acids string into coherent protein “sentences” that relay messages and do work within cells. Deleting an amino acid is like trying to type without the letter “e.” The text becomes gibberish.
Or does it? A team from Columbia University and collaborators stripped one amino acid, isoleucine, from ribosomes in Escherichia coli (E. Coli) bacteria. These cellular machines translate DNA into proteins, and they’re among the most complex structures in cells.
Deleting any amino acids could be catastrophic. But with some help from AI, Ec19 was born.
“This is a meaningful and stringent test of the consequences of removing isoleucine from a proteome’s alphabet, because the ribosome is one of life’s most complex and indispensable macromolecular machines,” wrote Charles Sanfiorenzo and Kaihang Wang at the California Institute of Technology, who were not involved in the study.
For the past decade, scientists have been probing the boundaries of life by shrinking genomes in a variety of microbes, adding synthetic amino acids to living cells, and even creating the building blocks for “mirror life.” But they’ve rarely tinkered with the canonical 20 amino acids.
Ec19 rewrites the script, but not for scientific curiosity alone. The findings pave the way for AI to help scientists engineer designer proteins and cells with added capabilities for use in biotechnology and medicine. It could also give us a peek into the earliest life on Earth.
“It’s very exciting that it’s possible,” Julius Fredens at the National University of Singapore, who was not involved in the research, told Nature.
Alphabet RewriteLife has its own language. DNA’s four molecular letters—A, T, C, G—encode the genetic blueprint. Three-letter units of DNA, called codons, call for each of the 20 amino acids, along with a stop signal that ends protein making.
But the system is redundant. Evolution created 64 codons, with some encoding the same amino acids. Scientists have begun rewriting genomes by assigning redundant codons to synthetic amino acids, yielding working proteins never seen in nature. Because they’re foreign to our bodies, these could escape being broken down—an advantage for drugs designed to last longer. Other researchers are tinkering with the genetic code in bacteria, yeast, and worms, building chromosomes from scratch or probing the limits of a minimal genome that can still support life.
Even the most ambitious tests for synthetic life have avoided whittling down the canonical set of protein letters. But study author Harris Wong was intrigued by the prospect. Some amino acids have similar shapes and chemistry, hinting they could stand in for one another. And mounting evidence suggests early life may have operated using a smaller vocabulary.
The team analyzed nearly 400 proteins essential to E. coli, tracking how often each amino acid was naturally swapped without breaking the protein. Isoleucine took the crown. The bulky, branched molecule was frequently replaced by two cousins similar in shape and chemical behavior. If any amino acid could be removed, isoleucine was it.
The next problem was scale. Previous studies recoded the E. coli genome. But building a stripped-down version of the bacteria would require edits at more than 81,000 genomic sites, a daunting challenge that could take years.
Instead, the researchers focused on the ribosome. It was still a lofty goal. The machines that make proteins are essential to life and are themselves made up of 50 proteins. Removing an amino acid would be like ridding metal from every part of a car engine and expecting it to run.
“Successfully removing isoleucine from such a large and essential RNA-protein complex would raise the possibility of entire genomes functioning with simplified, noncanonical amino acid alphabets,” wrote Sanfiorenzo and Wang.
The team’s first attempt hit a wall. In multiple bacterial strains, they replaced isoleucine codons with a close natural substitute, an amino acid called valine. Out of the 50 ribosome proteins, 32 edited proteins either hindered growth or triggered death.
Almost ready to shelve the project, the team turned to AI. Like the large language models that power chatbots, these algorithms can be trained on DNA and protein sequences. They can then dream up new amino acid sequences and predict how they fold into working proteins.
In this case, the advantage was creativity. AI came up with unintuitive ways to replace isoleucine without catastrophically damaging a protein’s structure. It sometimes suggested ways to compensate for amino acid swaps by making tweaks located far away in the genome. The team then tested promising designs to see if the bacteria survived and how well they grew.
Eventually, they landed on 47 working ribosome proteins without isoleucine. The remaining three took some elbow grease. They replaced amino acids, one by one, until they found a recipe that worked.
Simplified LifeIn the end, the team recoded every protein in the ribosome and built a single E. Coli bacteria, Ec19, carrying 21 of the modified proteins. Its growth slowed a smidge compared to unaltered bacteria, but the bacteria retained the altered ribosome across more than 450 generations.
It wasn’t a full rewrite, but the study is a step toward living cells that can run on 19 amino acids. This would open the door to new kinds of synthetic organisms. Removing isoleucine would free up the codons dedicated to it, making them easier to re-assign to designer amino acids and creating proteins with new chemical properties for medicine, materials, and biotechnology.
Ec19 also challenges our assumptions about life itself. We don’t yet know if the molecular language in modern cells is necessary for survival or is just what evolution settled on. If it’s the latter, how far can we expand that code—and should we?
As scientists use more AI, progress in synthetic biology may speed up. But the models aren’t in the driver’s seat yet. “Human intuition and intervention are still necessary, at least for now, to yield viable biological designs,” wrote Sanfiorenzo and Wang.
The post All Life Uses 20 Amino Acids. Scientists Just Deleted One in Bacteria. appeared first on SingularityHub.
Edge browser leaves passwords exposed in plain text, says researcher
A Norwegian researcher has identified an issue with Microsoft Edge’s Password Manager that could be a serious concern for businesses.
Tom Jøran Sønstebyseter Rønning found that passwords are being saved within the browser in plain text, with the effect that any PC, particularly a shared machine, within an organization is a potential risk.
In a post on X, Rønning explained that when users save passwords in Edge, the browser decrypts every credential at startup and keeps it resident in process memory, regardless of whether the user visits the site.
Rønning’s finding was replicated by German IT publication Heise.de, which created and saved a password and found that, even after the browser had been closed and re-opened, the password could be found in plain text.
Microsoft has been nonchalant about the discovery. It said, “Design choices in this area involve balancing performance, usability, and security, and we continue to review it against evolving threats. Browsers access password data in memory to help users sign in quickly and securely — this is an expected feature of the application.”
Rønning published a simple tool on GitHub that enables people to see for themselves that passwords are stored in plain text in memory.
Microsoft dismissed the significance of the passwords’ visibility, saying, “Access to browser data as described in the reported scenario would require the device to already be compromised.”
David Shipley, CEO of Beauceron Security, is not impressed with Microsoft’s response. “No, it’s not a feature. That’s an easy way to cop out of responsibility. It’s almost as bad as when firms say ‘working as designed.’ The point here, as with similar shortcomings, is convenience, speed, and avoiding investing more effort into something that they feel isn’t worth mitigating,” he said.
The bug is an open invitation to cyber criminals, said Shipley. “The old argument is that if malware gains persistence then it doesn’t make a difference, you’re in trouble anyway. It’s waving the white flag at cybercriminals and turning that white flag into a blank check for info stealers.”
Other browsers don’t suffer from the issue. For example, Google Chrome, in line with security industry recommendations, offers a system called App Bound Encryption that encrypts browser data and ensures that it is not stored in process memory in plain text.
It is not a foolproof system; it has been broken in the past, but by determined hackers. The Microsoft bug, on the other hand, requires little skill to exploit.
Shipley said that if Google can do a better job of securing its browser, there is no reason why Microsoft couldn’t do so with Edge. “It’s clearly not a technical hurdle. It’s a motivational one, which shouldn’t surprise anyone because Microsoft is giving away the browser. You don’t pay for it, so why should they care about locking it down more than the bare minimum?“
Given Microsoft’s attitude, users may well want to look for another password manager, something that would be more secure.
This article has been updated with a response from Microsoft.
Widely used Daemon Tools disk app backdoored in monthlong supply-chain attack
Daemon Tools, a widely used app for mounting disk images, has been backdoored in a monthlong compromise that has pushed malicious updates from the servers of its developer, researchers said Tuesday.
Kaspersky, the security firm reporting the supply-chain attack, said it began on April 8 and remained active as of the time its post went live. Installers that are signed by the developer’s official digital certificate and downloaded from its website infect Daemon Tools executables, causing the malware to run at boot time. Kaspersky didn’t explicitly say so, but based on technical details, the infected versions appear to be only those that run on Windows. Versions 12.5.0.2421 through 12.5.0.2434 are affected. Neither Kaspersky nor developer AVB could be contacted immediately for additional details.
Hard to defend againstInfected versions contain an initial payload that collects MAC addresses, hostnames, DNS domain names, running processes, installed software, and system locales. The malware sends them to an attacker-controlled server. Thousands of machines in more than 100 countries were targeted. Out of the many machines infected, about 12 of them, belonging to retail, scientific, government, and manufacturing organizations, have received a follow-on payload—an indication that the supply-chain attack targets select groups.
DAEMON Tools trojanized in supply-chain attack to deploy backdoor
OpenCL 3.1
Ask Jeeves bites the dust
Ask Jeeves, the popular search engine where users could enter questions using natural language, launched on June 1, 1997. Nine years later, it was rebranded as Ask.com — and ever since, the number of users has declined with each passing year.
On Friday, the service shut down for a good — a move made necessary due to its inability to compete with new AI tools, according to Mashable.
“We are deeply grateful to the brilliant developers and designers who have built and supported Ask over the decades,” reads the final message on the now-defunct search site. “And to you — the millions of users who turned to us for answers in a rapidly changing world — thank you for your endless curiosity, your loyalty, and your trust. The spirit of Jeeves will live on.”
Zvenku nenápadná dodávka, za dvě hodiny mobilní vysílač. O2 na festivaly přijede s anténou na čtyřech kolech
Notepad++ pro Mac už má za sebou první skandál. Autor nakonec změnil název i ikonku
Student hacked Taiwan high-speed rail to trigger emergency brakes
ServiceNow clears agents for landing with new AI control tower
Nejlepší světlo na monitor nikdy nebylo levnější. BenQ ScreenBar Halo 2 svítí i na stěnu
Critical Apache HTTP/2 Flaw (CVE-2026-23918) Enables DoS and Potential RCE
Critical Apache HTTP/2 Flaw (CVE-2026-23918) Enables DoS and Potential RCE
- « první
- ‹ předchozí
- …
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- …
- následující ›
- poslední »



