Agregátor RSS
Třetí generace Starshipu odstartovala. Loď ve vesmíru vyfotila družice, kterou raketa krátce před tím vypustila
Linux Privilege Escalation Patterns and Mitigation Strategies
Telefon za 1 Kč, internet od 199 Kč a bonus 7 500 Kč: nejlepší akce tohoto týdne
Událo se v týdnu 21/2026
Online ztrácení v Backrooms je novým zážitkem temné turistiky
Data Centers Now Consume 6% of US Electricity—and the Backlash Has Begun
Strong opposition kicks in when data center demand surpasses 5% of a country’s power supply.
As the AI boom accelerates, governments and utilities are struggling to keep pace with the industry’s huge energy demands. New figures suggest data centers now consume about 6 percent of electricity in the US, raising concerns about grid capacity and environmental impacts.
Data centers have always been energy-hungry, but the AI explosion is causing computing demand to skyrocket. The biggest data centers now consume as much electricity as small cities and are proliferating at breakneck speed.
A new report from the International Data Center Authority (IDCA) finds that the total power draw of all these facilities has now hit 67.7 gigawatts—a 36 percent jump over two years. The US alone accounts for 29.2 gigawatts of that total, roughly 43 percent of global consumption.
“Our real-time data shows that many very large AI factories are coming into operation, spiking up total US consumption,” Mehdi Paryavi, CEO and founder of IDCA, told Data Center Knowledge. “The US now devotes 6 percent of its total electricity to data centers.”
That could be a significant milestone, as the report warns that “significant community and political pushback starts to occur in nations once their data center footprints have reached the 5 percent consumption level of national grids.” The US isn’t alone—the UK is now using 5.8 percent of its electricity to power data centers, and in Germany, the figure has hit 9.5 percent.
Opposition is growing.
Hundreds of state-level bills to regulate data centers have been introduced, according to the report. In Maine, the legislature passed a bill that would have barred construction of data centers bigger than 20 megawatts until 2027. Maine’s governor, Janet Mills, vetoed the bill, and the legislature failed to override the veto. But Mills later signed an executive order forming a council to investigate the impact of data centers in the state, with recommendations due in early 2027.
Local planners are also refusing to issue new permits due to energy scarcity. For example, developers in Northern Virginia’s Data Center Alley, a region already densely packed with the facilities, will have to wait until 2032 to launch new projects.
Water usage is an equally important concern in many areas. The vast majority of data centers rely on water-cooled chillers or evaporative cooling towers that can consume millions of gallons daily. A single large facility can potentially draw as much water as 6,500 households. Modern AI facilities increasingly use more modern closed-loop liquid cooling systems that require minimal ongoing water use, but these account for a small proportion of the overall data center fleet.
The report suggests that some of this negative reaction is also self-inflicted. Developers routinely use locally registered entities with generic names that obscure who is actually behind a project, leading to a lack of trust in local communities.
“Before being swept along by the enthusiasm of tech billionaires whose profits depend on this expansion, we should pause and ask ourselves whether it’s worth the price,” Greenpeace UK’s chief scientist Doug Parr told the Guardian in response to the findings.
“We need more transparency about the amount of water and energy used by data centers, proper environmental impact assessments, and a ban on new polluting plants being built to power AI.”
It’s not only new projects putting strain on the grid though. The report found that an estimated 13 percent of US cloud consumption, totaling more than 3 gigawatts, comes from so-called “zombie” workloads—abandoned test environments and unused applications that continue to draw power without doing any useful work.
In addition, there are thousands of smaller data centers embedded in corporate buildings and regional offices drawing considerable amounts of power. These are often missed by consumption estimates that typically focus on large hyperscale campuses, but the IDCA says they account for at least 15 percent of total data center power consumption, in part because they are considerably less efficient than their larger counterparts.
The problems are only likely to get worse though, as tech companies show no signs of slowing down. Annual global data center spending is approaching $1 trillion, with up to $700 billion anticipated in the US alone in 2026, the report notes.
Whether grids will be able to absorb all that new capacity, and how hard local communities fight back against developments, may well end up being a deciding factor in whether the AI boom keeps rolling or fizzles out.
The post Data Centers Now Consume 6% of US Electricity—and the Backlash Has Begun appeared first on SingularityHub.
A Russian speaker and jailbroken Gemini went on a hacking spree and emptied at least one MAGA victim's crypto wallets
Megalodon chums the waters in 5.5K+ GitHub repo poisonings
Texas AG sues Meta over claims that WhatsApp doesn't provide end-to-end encryption
The Texas Attorney General has sued Meta over allegations that the company’s WhatsApp messenger, used by more than 3 billion people, doesn’t provide the end-to-end encryption (E2EE) it has long claimed.
Since at least 2016, Meta (then named Facebook) has said WhatsApp provides robust end-to-end encryption, meaning that messages are encrypted on a sender’s device with keys that are available only to the receiver's. By definition, E2EE means that no one else—including the platform itself—can read the plaintext messages.
In sworn testimony before two US Senate committees in 2018, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Meta does “not see any of the content in WhatsApp; it is fully encrypted” and that “Facebook systems do not see the content of messages being transferred over WhatsApp.” The engine for this E2EE is the Signal protocol, an open source code base that multiple third-party experts have said lives up to its promises.
FBI warns of Kali Oauth stealers
The FBI has warned of the danger from a new wave of phishing attacks generated by a tool called Kali365.
It enables cyber criminals to obtain Microsoft 365 access tokens and bypass multi-factor authentication (MFA) protocols without intercepting the user’s credentials by capturing Oauth tokens linked to the victim’s Microsoft 365 account.
The scam works in a similar way to most phishing attacks. An attacker sends an email purporting to be from a trusted cloud document sharing service, including instructions to enter a particular code on a legitimate Microsoft site.
The code, however, authorizes the attacker’s device to access the victim’s Microsoft account.
The FBI has issued a set of instructions for IT security managers to help mitigate the Kali365 attack before it affects their users. These include creating a conditional access policy to block code flow for all users, with exceptions for the necessary business processes. Managers should also block authentication transfer policies, preventing users from handing over their access rights from a corporate PC to a mobile device.
Phishing remains a major threat for organizations. According to a World Economic Forum report from January this year, CEOs worldwide see it as the main security threat. It’s also something that is not going away, 77 percent of organizations think that the number of phishing attacks has increased in the past year. Kali365 has just added to that number.
This article first appeared on CSO.
Netflix a další na víkend: Ranč Duttonových z Yellowstonu, S.W.A.T., The Boroughs. Nebo hororová Nevěsta!
Microsoft představil Azure Linux 4.0 a Azure Container Linux
Linux Infrastructure Under Siege by FamousSparrow Espionage Campaign
First VPN Dismantled in Global Takedown Over Use by 25 Ransomware Groups
First VPN Dismantled in Global Takedown Over Use by 25 Ransomware Groups
Netherlands seizes 800 servers of hosting firm enabling cyberattacks
Meta says goodbye to those who won’t use AI
Meta is the latest company to trim its workforce as a result of the growing use of AI within the industry. The company laid off 8,000 employees earlier this week, while also moving 7,000 more to AI-focused roles.
“AI is the most consequential technology of our lifetimes,” Zuckerberg said in a memo that he sent to employees, informing them of the cuts. “The companies that lead the way will define the next generation,” he added.
The company has not revealed too much detail of the changes in the workforce, but it’s clear that jobs focused on AI infrastructure will be protected.
Meta is not alone in announcing cuts. In a blog this month, Cisco said it was cutting 4,000 jobs and Microsoft is looking at inciting employees to take voluntary retirement for the first time.
The Meta reorganization is following the trend that businesses that don’t adapt to AI usage will struggle. Earlier this year, PwC US CEO Paul Griggs caused consternation when he suggested that executives who failed to get to grips with AI had a limited future in the company.
While workforces are increasingly dependent on AI as a path to progress, IT departments are not necessarily on top of the game. A Dataiku survey earlier this year revealed that 74% of CIOs were fearful that their career paths were dependent on AI outcomes.
Police take down VPN service (this time with a good reason)
European authorities have cracked down on a VPN that has been used for various criminal activities.
The operation, led by investigators in France and the Netherlands with help from Europol and Eurojust, has dismantled First VPN, a service that has been heavily promoted within Russia as a way of evading law enforcement. Criminals used it to conceal their identities and infrastructure while carrying out ransomware attacks, large-scale fraud, data theft, and other serious offences.
While First VPN’s fates seems well-deserved, there are concerns about wider attempts by governments and law enforcers to clamp down on users of VPN services. Various legislations have tried to implement new laws restricting access to the internet, in particular, those seeking to limit minors from accessing social media and other sites deemed inappropriate by authorities. Australia has already brought in such a law and the UK is looking to follow suit. However. VPNs providers have fought back, claiming that their offerings are a vital tool in the preservation of the internet as a free and open service — and in securing regular business activities for many enterprises.
Ina recent blog post Mozilla said, “Blunt interventions like mandatory age assurance and restricting access to tools like VPNs are not effective in improving the protection afforded to young people online, while undermining the fundamental rights of all users.”
Any restrictions against VPNs in the US are likely to fall foul of the First Amendment. Attempts by lawmakers to prohibit their use, such as the one proposed in Utah, are looking unlikely to succeed.
Chat Control vyhodíte oknem, ale vrátí se komínem, říká pirátka Gregorová (Podcast Živě)
The AI that cracked Apple Silicon is only the beginning
A security research team just used Claude Mythos to identify the first known exploit in Apple’s M5 chip. They needed physical access to the device to use it, the vulnerability has since been patched, and I don’t think it should be seen as a huge threat. But it is a stark warning that in this AI age, attackers can find and exploit system vulnerabilities at a dangerously fast rate.
While widely reported, the proof-of-concept exploit was of limited significance because it required direct physical access to the target device; what matters most is that it is a very real illustration of the new security reality.
AI doesn’t care whose side you’re onAI boosts productivity for everyone, including attackers. In this case, the technology augmented the human security research team’s efforts, enabling them to identify a weakness in Apple’s security system. This won’t be the first time AI gets used to identify hard-to-find bugs and certainly won’t be the last.
This should be a real concern to any platform provider, as it means the most well-resourced attackers will be leaning deep into AI to help them find vulnerabilities. And as AI improves, the capacity it provides will inevitably become more dangerous.
That’s even before you consider that some attackers work for the kind of state and state-adjacent entities that can afford aircraft carriers.
When nation-states come knockingAccess to such extensive resources means future AI-augmented attacks will have at their disposal the most powerful computational AI money can buy, which probably boils down to quantum computers.
The threat of quantum computers has been discussed since the 1990s. These systems are expected to be quite capable of breaking the encryption keys on which digital existence is built, and things will not be the same when they do. We don’t have long to wait until that threat becomes real. Google recently warned quantum computers will be able to hack into some, though not all, encrypted systems by 2029.
Once Q-Day breaks, there will be no going back. And just as Mythos AI was able to help security researchers break into Apple’s core security today, quantum computer-augmented AI is likely to open even more dangerous security frontiers. The Global Risk Institute warns organizations “should take immediate action to address this significant cyber risk.”
What you can do while the industry catches upWhat actions can we take now? We have to look to the tech firms to develop tech to protect us against tech:
- Google, for example, is investing in post-quantum cryptography (PQC) digital signature protection and will put similar protections in place across its own authentication services in the next couple of years.
- Apple says it has also deployed quantum-secure cryptography across a wide range of protocols, “prioritizing applications involving sensitive user information where attackers could harvest encrypted communications at scale.”
- Cisco is deep into developing quantum-secure networks, working with network partners such as Orange Business to protect enterprise and public-sector data from future quantum threats.
These protections will help secure some of the most important elements of the computing experience, but they won’t cover everything, leaving a less certain threat environment in which many of the least-resourced software developers are exposed.
Legacy systems, particularly around critical infrastructure and key industries like health or finance, will be particularly exposed. You really, really don’t want key systems at your hospital or bank to rely on insecure and unsupported Windows 10 machines, for example. (You’d be better of with a MacBook Neo — truly, you would.)
Apple is not a badly resourced developer, which means it has no choice but to invest heavily in additional security to protect its platforms against both quantum and AI threats. We’ve also got to prepare for even more complex attacks down the road, as the two powerful technologies converge (to the detriment of security).
Gather ye while you canWe know nation-state actors are already hoovering up huge quantities of encrypted data, as they hope to be able to decrypt it once quantum capability matures. (There’s even a name for this, HNDL, which stands for Harvest Now, Decrypt Later.)
You don’t need to panic. These new breed attacks will be massively expensive to put together, which suggests they’ll be used against the same high-value targets Apple built Lockdown Mode to protect. What we saw happen with the NSO Group, which made the Pegasus attack you can now buy on the dark web, and other similar exploits that leaked over time, show that sophisticated attacks will inevitably seep into general use over time.
For now you can choose to use quantum ready messaging services such as iMessage and, while we wait for PQC-compliant password managers to ship, at least make sure to use highly secure passwords for key apps and services. And monitor the news for AI-augmented security exploits against Apple equipment. And as always, never leave your Mac unattended anywhere people you don’t know or trust can reach it.
You can follow me on social media! Join me on BlueSky, LinkedIn, and Mastodon.
- « první
- ‹ předchozí
- …
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- …
- následující ›
- poslední »



