Agregátor RSS
[webapps] Apache Gravitino 1.2.1 - SSRF
[webapps] Blocksy Companion 2.1.46 - RCE
[remote] PraisonAI praisonaiagents 1.6.77 - Remote Code Execution
[remote] mcp-server-kubernetes 3.8.x - Argument Injection
[dos] LuCI DHCPv6 - Lease Hostname Stored Cross-Site Scripting
[webapps] Planyo_Online_Reservation_System 3.0 - Arbitrary File Read via SSRF
[webapps] Ray 2.56.0 - Directory Traversal & Local File Inclusion
Hackers breached a small Polish energy plant via private APN last year
Monochrome No More: New Night-Vision Glasses Show Color
The system combines quantum dots and an OLED display, translating infrared light into a range of visible colors.
Night-vision technology has changed little for decades, producing grainy green images that make it difficult to distinguish objects and depth. Now, researchers have developed a system that converts infrared light into color images.
Standard night-vision goggles amplify the scant light available and convert it into monochrome green images that only vary by brightness. This is not a good match for our eyes, which are much better at picking out different shades than gradations of brightness.
But now a device built by researchers at the Beijing Institute of Technology translates infrared wavelengths into a color night-vision system. To demonstrate the system’s potential, the team built it into a pair of eyeglasses and even showed it could be bound to light-sensitive cells, making them responsive to infrared.
“We redefine infrared vision by transcending the monochrome paradigm, translating infrared spectral and intensity signatures into discernible color variations rather than mere brightness changes,” the authors write in a paper in Science Advances.
The prototype device, known as an upconverter, consists of a stack of thin films on a glass slide that is only a few hundred nanometers thick. The key component is a film of mercury telluride quantum dots. These semiconductor crystals, which are under four nanometers across and exhibit novel quantum mechanical effects, can detect tiny amount of infrared radiation.
Directly above this layer sits an OLED display, much like those used in phones and televisions. But where a standard display has one light-emitting layer, this one has two. A lower layer that glows red responds to relatively low levels of charge from the detector, while an upper layer that glows cyan needs a much stronger flow before it responds.
The upshot is that a weak infrared signal produces only red, but as the signal strengthens it bleeds into cyan, brightening the image and shifting its color as the two mix. The signal is supplied by the quantum dots, which release more charge when the infrared falling on them is brighter. But they also release more when the wavelength is shorter because shorter wavelength photons carry more energy.
This means the color on the display tracks how strong the infrared signal is and also roughly what wavelength it is. The team calculates a person could register infrared power differences of 0.11 milliwatts per square centimeter using color and brightness together, against 23.71 for brightness alone—a roughly 200-fold improvement.
To demonstrate the idea’s real-world potential, the researchers built the device into a spectacle frame. Exposed to infrared light, the lens shifted from deep red through orange to yellow as the illumination grew stronger. It could also render patterns like letters and track targets as they moved and rotated.
The team also tested the approach’s ability to augment natural vision. In one experiment, they engineered neurons to produce channelrhodopsin-2—a protein that makes a nerve cell fire when hit by blue light—and bound the upconverter to them.
When they hit the system with infrared, their device gave off blue light strong enough to trigger the proteins and stimulate the neurons. Electrical recordings also showed the currents inside those cells grew stronger as the strength of the infrared signal was turned up.
Finally, the team tried taping an upconverter over the eyes of mice and humans and recording the electrical responses in their brains and retinas respectively. Infrared pulses alone produced no reaction, but when the device was in place both reacted strongly.
The device is still a long way from practical use. All the demonstrations took place in highly controlled lab settings, the OLED display needs a power source, and the device also requires an infrared illuminator to generate reflections for the detector to pick up.
Nonetheless, it’s a first step towards far more powerful night-vision technology.
The post Monochrome No More: New Night-Vision Glasses Show Color appeared first on SingularityHub.
Klienti Partners Banky už si mohou koupit přes aplikaci bitcoin. Některé zájemce o krypto ale nová služba neuspokojí
Nový dodavatel energií vás nepřevedl včas. Fakturu od dodavatele poslední instance musíte zaplatit, rozhodl soud
Lupa: propojení programovacích jazyků Lua a Python
AMD vydává dvě Gorgony bez AI, mobilní až osmijádrové Zen 5 s vyplým NPU
Klíčový pokrok v cestě Indie za thoriovým cyklem
Mastek – sprostý podezřelý
Rotující galaxie nesou otisk raného vesmíru
BdThemes plugins supply-chain hack creates rogue WordPress admins
DEF CON hackers add new muscle to water utility protection
OpenAI releases ChatGPT 5.6 Cyber, but it's only for approved users
Today’s AI hype-fest is partially IT’s fault
I came across a LinkedIn post the other day that described “hypegineering,” which the poster explained refers to the moment when AI “marketing becomes more innovative than the technology itself.”
That post came from Ralph Aboujaoude Diaz, the global head of GRC for British consumer services company Haleon. Until last year, Diaz worked in operations cybersecurity for consumer goods giant Philip Morris.
In his post, Diaz added that “side effects may include believing mediocre tech is revolutionary, confusing hype with progress, buying solutions to problems you don’t have and defending it like your job depends on it.”
As amusing as that might seem, the problem is frighteningly real. The sad truth is that enterprise IT executives are partly — perhaps mostly — to blame for the current hype around AI.
For many decades, senior IT leaders (pre-dating when it was called MIS) were the technology hype-deflators with razor-shape BS detection skills. That level of skepticism was needed. Tech vendors have always exaggerated and left out critical context when they weren’t outright lying about their products.
Enterprises trusted the IT gate-keepers to ferret out reality from the smoke and mirrors.
But there was a critical difference back then: senior management (especially CEOs, CFOs and board members) didn’t pay much attention to tech. They wanted the benefits, but they left the details to IT management to sort things out. With senior managers, benign neglect can be an incredibly good thing.
As much as we might all think that we want our bosses to really care about our efforts, be careful what you wish for. (For Dilbert fans, think of the pointy-haired boss; a boss who has strong beliefs but no understanding of technology is a nightmare.)
Alas, that is the situation many enterprises find themselves in today. IT management fully understands the level of absurd hype coming from a multitude of AI players. But unlike years and technologies past (RFID? NFC? Biometrics?), deflating hype balloons is easier when it’s comes solely from vendors. When senior managers start spouting this garbage, IT’s hype-deflation ability morphs into contradicting the very people at the top of their own corporate food chain.
That forces IT leaders who want to stay gainfully employed to do a lot of what used to be called lying. “Well, boss, yes these agentic systems have guardrails that will block destruction,” the lie begins, “but we can’t anticipate what any user or attacker might say in a prompt.”
That’s far more corporate acceptable than the actual truth: “Boss, a guardrail that an agent can disregard isn’t a guardrail. It’s more of a mild suggestion.”
Or IT could say, “Well, yes, boss, autonomous agents could exponentially increase efficiency — as long as you’re OK with the risk that they might send our internal data to the competition.”
For the sake of the company, tech leaders and decision-makers need to reassert themselves and perform serious reality checks on all AI efforts. But this is more fraught than merely contradicting a top boss. IT could be seen as embarrassing that top boss by pretty much proving that they were either naive or ignorant enough to be conned by the hype.
Telling them they’re wrong seems nicer than calling them stupid. And yet, someone in IT has to find a politically palatable way to do both.
- « první
- ‹ předchozí
- …
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- …
- následující ›
- poslední »



